Skip to main content

WIS5-90516b Part 1



Q 1: D
Section 4.1.3, impact toughness test.
 
 Q 2: B
Section 4.1.6 and figure 4.16, side bend test.
 
 Q 3: A
Section 6.3, welder qualification to make a sound weld, defect free.
 
 Q 4: B
Section 2.3, “toe” definitions, and figure 6.31 – concave fillet weld. 
 
 Q 5: C
Root bead penetration mainly influenced by root gap.
 
 Q 6: D
Section 3.6.1, undercut sharpness due to high travel speed, high welding current, lowest heat input gives to high hardness.
Section 10.3 heat input determine.
 
 Q 7: A
Hardness test is another NDT method.
Root beads made with low amperage and voltage to control penetration; it may not occur tungsten inclusion.
 
 Q 8: D
Section 2.6.2 shape of fillet welds, throat thickness.
 
 Q 9: D
Section 1.1, basic requirements for visual inspection.
 
 Q 10: A
Section 1.1.5, duties of welding inspector.
 
 Q 11: D
Incomplete root penetration means fusion face of root are not melted, see Figure 3.18.
“Excessive root gap given more root penetration or excess penetration”.
 
 Q 12: A
Incomplete root fusion or lack of root fusion, one fusion face of root is not melted, see Figure 3.16.
- Answer B, root gap to large give more penetration.
- Answer C, root face being too small easy to melt the root edge.
- Answer D, Amperage too high given more penetration.
  
 Q 13: D
“flaws” is other name of defects, most using in API specification.
Keyword “the most serious” mean the most of project specification are not accepted the defect like surface planer defect, crack, …
- Answer A, B, C may be accepted if these imperfections are allowed by Acceptance Criteria, see An Acceptance Levels at page 595 or Appendix A2-36.
- Arc strikes are not permitted for plate/pipe and macro.
- An arc strike is a type of crack, can produce a hard HAZ, lead to serious cracking in-service.
- Better to grind out and then MPI for surface detection.
 
 Q 14: C
See Section 3.6.10 or Figure 3.28.
Root gap too large or high welding current may occur burn-through defect.
 
 Q 15: B
Answer A, not correct at “quality only”.
Answer C, not correct, specification not only for “finished product”.
Answer D, not correct, code of practices may be standard, recommend practices (RP), or procedures, …
 
 Q 16: A
Solid inclusion such flux, oxide, tungsten, slag trapped in the weld metal.
See Section 3.4.
 
 Q 17: A
Planar imperfection such lamination, crack, lack of fusion (sidewall, root, inter-run, cap).
Slag / porosity is a non-planar defect.
 
 Q 18: B
Throat thickness (actual) is extremely hard to measure, it will calculate by 1.141 times leg length. It may check in the macro sample. 
 
 Q 19: C
Face tension --> face bend
Root tension --> root bend
Side tension --> face bend
 
 Q 20: C
Key works “heavy porosity, MMA, site, is most likely” are considered moisture contents.
 
 Q 21: A
MIG and MAG welding process use a solid wire welding consumable, defect not included slag.
MMA, slag produce from covered electrode, for weld pool protection from atmosphere, it may trap in the weld metal.
 
 Q 22: A
Key word “main cause, undercut is”, best answer is excessive amps or high welding current.
Other cause may be high travel speed.
 
 Q 23: B
Key words “is most likely, continuous monitoring”, best answer is B for pipe welder.
 
 Q 24: A
Key words “strongest, fillet welds”, which one given thicker of throat thickness.
See Section 2.6.1.
 
 Q 25: B
Keywords “included angle, full penetration, pipe butt joint, MMA”, best practice is 70 degree. 
See Section 2.4.1 and Figure 2.11.
 
 Q 26: C
Answer: 8 – 7*0.7 = 3.1 mm in throat thickness.
See Figure 2.28.
 
 Q 27: A
Fusion boundary or fusion line see Figure 2.8 or Figure 2.9.
 
 Q 28: B
Keyword “not allowed by the application standard” means defects, defect is not allowed.
See Section 3.1, or acceptance level sheet in appendix A2-36.
 
 Q 29: B
Keyword “a magnifying glass” and see Section 1.1.4, appendix 5.
 
 Q 30: D
See Section 6.3 and Section 6.3.2.
 
 
 Q 31: C
Common occur SAW process because high current, DC EP polarity.
Reduce arc blow by change DC to AC power source.
 
 Q 32: A
E6013/E7016 classified in AWS A5.1.
E 51 33 B, number “51” is min. yield strength and “33” is min. absorbed energy is not classified in ISO 2560. 
See Figure 16.3.
 
 Q 33: B
Keyword “stovepipe” or “country pipeline”, root bead made by Cellulosic electrode, downhill position (PF).
See Section 11.3.5.
 
 Q 34: A
See Section 11.3.5 and Table 16.1.
 
 Q 35: B
Max. weld bead > low travel speed > high heat input > low toughness.
See Figure 2.38 – weave bead, Section 10.3 – heat input influence.
Note: Heat input / arc energy major influence on the travel speed.
 
 Q 36: C
Filler rods/cored wire/sticks of MMA electrode is a general of low-quality rimming steel.
See Section 16.1.
 
 Q 37: B
Keyword “slope-out”, also learning slope-up.
See Section 12.4 and 12.5.
 
 Q 38: C
Keyword “manual welding, power source or drooping characteristic”.
See Section 10.5.1 and Figure 10.1.
 
 Q 39: D
Keyword “penetration, controlled”.
See Section 10.3.1.
 
 Q 40: C
Keyword “purged with Ag, backing gas” for purpose avoid excessive oxidation or control root bead.
See Section 12.2.6.
 
 Q 41: B
Filler rods/cored wire/sticks of MMA electrode is a general of low-quality rimming steel, refer Question 36 of this part.
The coating contains many elements and compounds.
See Section 16.1.
 
 Q 42: A
See Section 16.1.
 
 Q 43: B
See Section 16.4
 
 Q 44: C
Keyword “AWS A2.4, other side”, see Section 9.12.
 
 Q 45: D
Keyword “low hydrogen or hydrogen scale”.
See Section 11.3.5 and Section 17.3.3, or EN 1011-2.
 
 Q 46: A
Keyword “hydrogen control”, see Figure 16.3 (letter H5) is a max. scale of hydrogen. See Annex C2 of EN 1011-2.
 
 Q 47: C
Keyword “weld toes to be smoothly blended on the other side”, 
Other side shall be placed on the dash-line.
See Section 9.4 and 9.8.
 
 Q 48: D
Heat input and arc energy, see Section 10.3.
 
 Q 49: C
Keyword “creep resistance”, See Section 7.3.
 
 Q 50: A
Accessing quality of weld, or quality of joint.
See Section 4 and Section 4.1.7.
 


Comments

Popular Posts

Lưu ý thành viên Telegram

QUAN TRỌNG !!! 1. Tất cả thành viên tham gia phải đúng tên và đầy đủ tên thật khi tham gia nhóm. 2. Thành viên vị phạm sẽ bị loại mà không thông báo trước. 3. Những thành viên bị loại, vui lòng xóa tài khoản và tạo tài khoản mới để tham gia lại. 4. Thành viên loại, Admin không hỗ trợ quay lại nhóm. 5. Link tham gia:  https://t.me/+dUB42hQsIn5iMGFl  . Thân Biên ND  Telegram user: @biennd

Standard for Welding Inspector / Welding Engineer

WB-001  - EN 1090 & ISO 3834  -  Code Books BS EN 1090-1 - 2009+A1-2011 BS EN 1090-2 2018 ISO 3834-1-2021 ISO 3834-2-2021 ISO 3834-3-2021 ISO 3834-4-2021 ISO 3834-5-2021 WB-002 - EWF/IIW Diploma – Design and Construction / EWF/IIW Diploma – Fabrication and Application TWI - IWE DAC2 course notes TWI - IWE FAA2 Course Notes TWI - IWE MAB2 course notes TWI - IWE WPE2 course notes WB-006 ~ WB-009 - IWE 2018 IWE 2018 – Module 1 IWE 2018 – Module 2 IWE 2018 – Module 3 IWE 2018 – Module 4 WB-010 EN-ISO Welding Procedure  -  Code Books ISO 15607 2019 ISO 15608 2013 ISO 15609-1 2019 ISO 15610 2003 ISO 15611 2019 ISO 15612 2018 ISO 15613 2004 ISO 15614-1 2017 EN 1011-2_2001 EN 1011-3 2003 ISO 2553 2019 ISO 4063 - 2009 ISO 6947 2011 ISO 14175 2014 ISO TR 17671-1-2 ISO 17659 2005 ISO-9692-1 2013 ISO-9692-2 1998 ISO-9692-3 2002 ISO 9606-1 2017 ISO 14732 2013 WB-011 - EN-ISO Inspection  -...

CSWIP 3.1 Notes

1. Misunderstanding the questions and negative sentences Most CSWIP questions are prepared with using the negative words such as  not, unlikely, unsuitable, most.  These questions may reduce our score if you are inadequately understood; it is one of important point which may cause of failure. So, I recommend a best way to answer more questions and read carefully study book, and then summaries in chart of your understanding. Below examples are listed some question related the negative sentences: Q_1.1 Which of the following would be most  unlikely  to be found in a butt welded butt joint using conventional radiographic method of NDT? Answer: A “U” preparation, if any lack of sidewall fusion imperfection due to its indication may parallel with the beam. Q_1.2 Which of the following defects is  unlikely  to be found by visual inspection? Answer: Linear misalignment, undercut, overlap: an external imperfection and can check during visual inspection, Slag inclus...

AWS - Fillet weld sketch

Updated: 30-Dec-2023 Order pWPS/WPS/WQT form at  https://shop.duybien.com/ 

Preheat calculation

 [1] Heat Input - Welding process denoted number 111, 121, 126, … according to BS EN ISO 4063:2010 shall be applied k-factor (EN 1011-1). AWS/ASME - welding processes will multiple constant k-factor (k=1). [2] Preheat - Preheat determination based on base material CET and according to Annex C of EN 1011-2:2001 (See C.3.2.1). [3] Cooling time t8/5 - calculation of cooling time t800/500 according to Annex D of EN 1011-2:2001 (See D.6). [4] Input your data into the YELOW cell. --> Download free at here .

Pre-Course CSWIP 3.1

Mục đích: Hỗ trợ ôn lại kiến thức cơ bản, chuẩn bị trước khóa học CSWIP 3.1 qua việc đọc tài liệu theo các mục cố định, soạn keynote, và tham gia buổi chia sẻ online. Weekly Sections (Tuần tự ôn lại theo chương) Typical Duties of Welding Inspectors Terms and Definitions Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection Destructive Testing Non-destructive Testing WPS/Welder Qualifications Materials Inspection Codes and Standards Welding Symbols Introduction to Welding Processes Manual Metal Arc (MMA) Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) Metal Inert/Active Gas (MIG/MAG) Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) Thermal Cutting Processes Welding Consumables Weldability of Steels Weld Repairs Residual Stresses and Distortions Heat Treatment Hướng dẫn tự học mỗi tuần: Đọc kỹ lường: 2 ~ 3 lần/chương Ghi chúc Keynote riêng hoặc vẽ mindmap tắt tần tật các chân lý Soạn câu hỏi tham khảo mỗi phần để kiểm tra Trả lời và đối chiếu đḟt nội dung sác...

Giám sát hàn

(Hình ảnh chụp tại nhà máy CNI - Nhơn Trạch) I. NÊN HỌC CSWIP KHÔNG? BẮT ĐẦU TỪ ĐÂU? Khi bắt đầu tìm hiểu về chứng chỉ CSWIP (Certification Scheme for Welding and Inspection Personnel), rất nhiều người đặt câu hỏi: "Tôi có nên học CSWIP không?" Câu trả lời không phụ thuộc vào xu hướng mà nằm ở định hướng nghề nghiệp, kiến thức, kỹ năng và kinh nghiệm thực tế của chính bạn. 1. Đặt câu hỏi đúng để có quyết định đúng Bạn đã từng làm công tác giám sát hàn chưa? Bạn có kinh nghiệm thực tế về thi công, kiểm tra lắp dựng cơ khí? Bạn có dự định theo đuổi nghề giám sát chất lượng lâu dài không? Nếu câu trả lời là "chưa", tốt nhất bạn không nên học CSWIP ngay , vì đây là hướng đi chuyên biệt và cần sự chuẩn bị nghiêm túc. Thay vào đó, bạn nên tập trung tích lũy kinh nghiệm, tìm hiểu thêm về nghề nghiệp, mục tiêu và xác định rõ vai trò bạn muốn gắn bó trong ngành cơ khí và kiểm tra chất lượng. 2. Tránh học theo phong trào Không phải ai có chứng chỉ CSWIP cũng sẽ có công việc ...